La Scalea v. Woolsey Holding Corp.

14 A.D.2d 912, 221 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7802
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 20, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 A.D.2d 912 (La Scalea v. Woolsey Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
La Scalea v. Woolsey Holding Corp., 14 A.D.2d 912, 221 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7802 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

[913]*913In our opinion, the lease provision reserving to defendant Woolsey Holding Corp., the landlord, the right to enter the demised premises, examine them, and make any repairs it deemed necessary or desirable, together with the evidence of actual prior repairs made by the landlord, raises a jury question as to whether the landlord reserved such control as would render it liable for failure to correct the alleged dangerous condition (Scudero v. Campbell, 288 N. Y. 328; De Clara v. Barber S. S. Lines, 309 N. Y. 620; Boreyko v. Bay Ridge Sav. Bank, 274 App. Div. 1060; Reische v. Montgomery, 273 App. Div. 824; Allen v. Watson, 275 App. Div. 1046). We also believe that the evidence that the wooden stairway was “rotten” before and at the time of the accident, was sufficient to raise a jury question as to said defendant’s constructive notice of the defective condition (cf. Scudero v. Campbell, supra). Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 A.D.2d 912, 221 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/la-scalea-v-woolsey-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1961.