La Quint Sullivan v. State

Opinion

/M T sr/m: of

Btxtx

C

5 ?

<>2>

MOTION TO ~o 5

CO ■.-.'-

« ;.•'

ASIDE INOIC W-f- m He

/a/ if Mi's t Court fit

IN addihctv A vy &t-i,r t Sy /an

/■ 71*/ //-

/fat perse* fa w fit-

J. • /t

m

32A.

ART, it 4. Ol. T*/+t *S

y fc aefa j{<//J< On, fails

This arhe'fe "«S

(I) 100 dHf/S // Mt ^

T a

ar lk& fn+ry ,

IE.

Mf.it.

fit s. *

y>^

Hi

, j

, w h/l -/it/- Ji/t. 0?j Mf **/ /(rfcU I*- 60/... 4^

S f r*f*

to

SB

-H) ^

t ok hi ' —~r . $4,6 is Urth f

fk<L _

^

O C

o n

C3,

Q

f—

so

G vn

Q!

0 m

Q

"So

re*

c CO *

rl

1

■=!■

■ ■

31

o

-■■

.VXJ

r - -

□

j

p

- ..,

o i : : VI

■' o

■.-■