La Quint Sullivan v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: August 10, 2015
• Docket: 04-15-00493-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cause NO. _i /

THE STATE OF TEXAS VS. IN THE DISTRICT COURT JP JUDICIAL DISTRICT BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS

NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM NEGOTIATED PLEA

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: Come now j

1. There was a trial in this cause C )yes C )no o -H and the trial was a 3 1 —I

( ) jury trial ( ) non-jury trial 2. The trial commenced on the day of , °ntoe day of _, ana°ended: J. mere was a plea bargain agreement

)no

4. The plea bargain agreement was followed by the Court ( )no 5. Defendant was sentenced on the /V davof r.;t sentence commenced on the on tEi-~ 11 W~ .and 6. A motion for New Trial was filed i )no

(A) the appeal is for ajurisdictional defect (explanation attached hereto); _ (B) the substance ofthe appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial (motion and ruling attached hereto); _ (C) permission to appeal

( ) lias-been granted by trial court ( ) has been denied by trial court Respectfully submitted,

"Defendant STATE OF TEXAS' vs

SULLIVAN, UQ 545777 09/30/1975

WOOD I,,, BERTRAM OLIVER 310SSAINTM/- 7

(210)482-9663 r

J se,eo,ed *o The

Case Court 485467 Offense CC2 2015CR7177 D187 -2 07 2015CR2233 D187

.i-"1

Bi -i

■■■: ^

:12pm