L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Mayo

196 So. 176, 142 Fla. 707, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1448
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 7, 1940·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the record in this case fails to reveal any reversible error, therefore, the final order entered by the chancellor is—

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Ci-iapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Brown and Buford, J. J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Mayo, 196 So. 176, 142 Fla. 707, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1448 (Fla. 1940).

196 So. 176 (L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Mayo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mugler v. Kansas
123 U.S. 623 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RR
227 U.S. 88 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Sligh v. Kirkwood
237 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1915)
L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Mayo
139 So. 121 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Bryan
111 So. 801 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Pridgen v. Sweat
170 So. 653 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Hart v. State
103 So. 633 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. Maxcy
128 So. 853 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Fowler
114 So. 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Ex Parte Lewis
135 So. 147 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
State v. . R. R.
54 S.E. 294 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
State v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
56 Fla. 617 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)
State ex rel. Young v. Duval County
76 Fla. 180 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Texas Co. v. Amos
81 So. 471 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Bailey v. Van Pelt
78 Fla. 337 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Whitaker v. Parsons
86 So. 247 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)