Bailey v. Van Pelt

78 Fla. 353
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 15, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 78 Fla. 353 (Bailey v. Van Pelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bailey v. Van Pelt, 78 Fla. 353 (Fla. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The reasonableness of the regulations alleged to have been knowingly and wilfully violated by the petitioner was not made an issue in this proceeding, and upon the charge made in the information filed against the petitioner, the sufficiency of which was not questioned [354]*354in the court below, the question of the reasonableness of no specified rule or regulation was presented; but the opinion herein indicates that the validity .and reasonableness of the regulations promulgated and sought to be enforced under the authority of the statutes are subject to judicial review in appropriate proceedings.

Rehearing denied.

Taylor, Whitfield and West,, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Marine Exploration Company, Incorporated
583 F.2d 1336 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)
Jackson v. Marine Exploration Co.
583 F.2d 1336 (Fifth Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 Fla. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bailey-v-van-pelt-fla-1919.