L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States
47 Cust. Ct. 241
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Cust. Ct. 331 →
United States Customs Court·Decided June 27, 1961·No. No. 65852; protests 60/29167, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the
merchandise consists of chinaware miniature tea sets the same in all material respects as those the subject of B. Shackman & Co. and S. Stern Henry & Co. v. United States (28 Cust. Ct. 298, C.D. 1426), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States, 47 Cust. Ct. 241 (cusc 1961).
47 Cust. Ct. 241 (L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shackman v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 298 (U.S. Customs Court, 1952)