L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States
42 Cust. Ct. 359
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 Cust. Ct. 331 →
United States Customs Court·Decided April 23, 1959·No. No. 62987; protest 58/6027 (New York)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of toy furniture sets similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. v. United States (34 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 1695), the merchandise was held dutiable under paragraph 1513 at the rate in effect at the time of withdrawal for consumption.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 359 (cusc 1959).
42 Cust. Ct. 359 (L. Batlin & Son, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United States
34 Cust. Ct. 145 (U.S. Customs Court, 1955)