L. B. Kaye Associates, Ltd. v. Libov

139 A.D.2d 440, 527 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14932
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 14, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 139 A.D.2d 440 (L. B. Kaye Associates, Ltd. v. Libov) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
L. B. Kaye Associates, Ltd. v. Libov, 139 A.D.2d 440, 527 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

— Motion for re-argument granted, and upon reargument, this court’s order entered on December 22,1987 (135 AD2d 1153) is vacated.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (C. Beauchamp Ciparick, J.), entered on or about October 9, 1986, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements.

The motion of third-party plaintiff, Rhona Libov, for summary judgment declaring third-party defendant, Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives, Inc., liable under the indemnity agreement was properly denied. Absent a specific provision in the contract of indemnity, an indemnitee is not required to give the indemnitor notice of the claims against him. (Delaware & Hudson R. R. Corp. v Adirondack Farmers Coop. Exch, 33 AD2d 962, 963 [3d Dept 1970], citing Conner v Reeves, 103 NY 527, 529-530.) If, however, the indemnitee fails to notify the indemnitor, "or having notified him, refuses to accept proffered assistance, he proceeds at his own risk with regard to any judgment or settlement which may ultimately ensue. Then, in order to recover reimbursement he must establish that he would have been liable and that there was no good defense to the liability” (Feuer v Menkes Feuer, Inc., 8 AD2d 294, 299 [1st Dept 1959]; Baker v Northeastern Indus. Park, 73 AD2d 753, 754 [3d Dept 1979]). Inasmuch as third-party plaintiff elected to proceed with counsel of her own choosing, rather than the counsel proffered by her indemnitor, and as her liability to plaintiff has yet to be determined, her motion was premature. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
5 F. Supp. 3d 452 (S.D. New York, 2014)
In re Liquidaition of Union Indemnity Insurance of New York
67 A.D.3d 469 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
ELRAC, Inc. v. Cruz
182 Misc. 2d 523 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1999)
Prudential Insurance v. Dewey
170 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 A.D.2d 440, 527 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-b-kaye-associates-ltd-v-libov-nyappdiv-1988.