L. A. Concrete Pumping, Inc., a California Corporation v. Leo A. Majich, Etc., Defendants-Respondents
Opinions
This court declines to suspend the order of the district court dissolving the state court injunction which had been issued before removal.
Most or all of the acts restrained by the state court have already been accomplished. In order to provide effective relief now, some mandatory affirmative commands would have to be decreed. This, in our opinion, would put us in direct conflict with 29 U.S.C. § 104. We, to some extent, accept prior state action as valid in a case after removal to a federal court, but at least when we must re-cut the whole cloth we believe we are precluded by federal statutes from doing so in this case.
If either party desires to expedite the appeal, he may move to do so, proposing a schedule of necessary steps.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
483 F.2d 524 (L. A. Concrete Pumping, Inc., a California Corporation v. Leo A. Majich, Etc., Defendants-Respondents) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.