L. A. Concrete Pumping, Inc., a California Corporation v. Leo A. Majich, Etc., Defendants-Respondents
This text of 483 F.2d 524 (L. A. Concrete Pumping, Inc., a California Corporation v. Leo A. Majich, Etc., Defendants-Respondents) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This court declines to suspend the order of the district court dissolving the state court injunction which had been issued before removal.
Most or all of the acts restrained by the state court have already been accomplished. In order to provide effective relief now, some mandatory affirmative commands would have to be decreed. This, in our opinion, would put us in direct conflict with 29 U.S.C. § 104. We, to some extent, accept prior state action as valid in a case after removal to a federal court, but at least when we must re-cut the whole cloth we believe we are precluded by federal statutes from doing so in this case.
If either party desires to expedite the appeal, he may move to do so, proposing a schedule of necessary steps.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
483 F.2d 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/l-a-concrete-pumping-inc-a-california-corporation-v-leo-a-majich-ca9-1973.