Kyriaco v. United States
401 U.S. 922, 91 S. Ct. 863
Opinion
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied without prejudice, however, to petitioners’ making their respective applications, if they so choose, to the District Court for such relief, if any, as may be appropriate in light of developments occurring since petition for writ of certiorari was filed in this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kyriaco v. United States, 401 U.S. 922, 91 S. Ct. 863 (1971).
401 U.S. 922 (Kyriaco v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rogers Transportation, Inc. v. Stern
763 F.2d 165 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Rogers Transportation, Inc., No. 84-3493 v. Honorable Herbert J. Stern, U.S.D.J. For the District of New Jersey, United States of America and Scott R. Hammond, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Rogers Transportation, Inc., No. 84-5556
763 F.2d 165 (Third Circuit, 1985)
Zimmer v. Connett
640 F.2d 208 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
David H. Zimmer and Carolyn J. Zimmer v. William H. Connett, District Director, Internal Revenue Service, Joseph Vallerand and Roberta W. Vallerand v. William H. Connett, District Director, Internal Revenue Service
640 F.2d 208 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
United States of America, and John D. Heeney, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Lorene Billingsley
469 F.2d 1208 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
United States v. Kyriaco
326 F. Supp. 1184 (C.D. California, 1971)