Kyle Miller v. State
Opinion
The State of TexasAppellee
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
August 5, 2014
No. 04-14-00041-CR
Kyle MILLER,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011CR5502 Honorable Pat Priest, Judge Presiding
ORDER
On July 16, 2014, we granted pro se appellant Kyle Miller’s motion to correct the record.
We ordered the court reporter to file a corrected record by July 31, 2014. In his response, the court reporter stated that despite his diligent search, neither he nor Appellant’s trial attorney could locate the missing exhibits. The court reporter indicated the exhibits “were marked in the punishment phase and were family photos of the defendant, his daughter and wife or girlfriend.”
Having considered the motion and the court reporter’s response, we conclude the missing exhibits are not necessary to the appeal’s resolution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e), (f)(3).
Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.
Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of August, 2014.
Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kyle Miller v. State (Kyle Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.