Kwtx Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

272 F.2d 406, 4 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5893, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 1959
Docket17827
StatusPublished
Cited by44 cases

This text of 272 F.2d 406 (Kwtx Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kwtx Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 272 F.2d 406, 4 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5893, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975 (5th Cir. 1959).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This petition to review the decision of the Tax Court presents the question whether that court’s finding and conclusion, that the initial outlay made by petitioner in obtaining its three year license to operate a television station cannot be depreciated over the life of the license, under Sec. 167, I.R.C. of 1954, 26 U.S. C.A. § 167, and T.R. Sec. 1.167(a)-3, is clearly erroneous.

The regulation upon which petitioner bases its claim to the right to take depreciation over the life of the license (plus the life of the temporary license) provides :

“If an intangible asset is known from, experience or other factors to be of use in the business * * * for only a limited period, the length of which can be estimated with reasonable accuracy, such an asset may be the subject of a depreciation allowance. * * * ” (Emphasis added.)

We affirm the findings of fact and conclusions of the Tax Court, that, on the basis of the history of the regulation of the television industry by the Federal Communications Commission, 1 it is “not known from experience or other factors” that this intangible asset is of use in the business for only a limited period.

Therefore, we affirm the decision of the Tax Court on its findings of fact and opinion, 31 T.C. 952, and on this court’s earlier decision in Nachman v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 191 F.2d 934.

Decision affirmed.

1

. The Commission has never refused to grant a renewal of a license once it has been granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jefferson-Pilot Corp. v. Commissioner
98 T.C. No. 32 (U.S. Tax Court, 1992)
Forward Communications Corp. v. United States
608 F.2d 485 (Court of Claims, 1979)
Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Commissioner
67 T.C. 964 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Cagle v. Commissioner
539 F.2d 409 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
First Sec. Bank, N.A. v. Commissioner
63 T.C. 644 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)
Rodeway Inns of America v. Commissioner
63 T.C. No. 37 (U.S. Tax Court, 1974)
Chandler Trailer Convoy, Inc. v. Commissioner
1973 T.C. Memo. 285 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Van De Steeg v. Commissioner
60 T.C. No. 3 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Commercial Security Bank v. Walker Bank & Trust Co.
456 F.2d 1352 (Tenth Circuit, 1972)
Toledo TV Cable Co. v. Commissioner
55 T.C. 1107 (U.S. Tax Court, 1971)
Dustin v. Commissioner
53 T.C. 491 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
Gulf Tel. Corp. v. Commissioner
52 T.C. 1038 (U.S. Tax Court, 1969)
E. T. Griswold v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
400 F.2d 427 (Fifth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 F.2d 406, 4 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5893, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kwtx-broadcasting-company-inc-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca5-1959.