Kwambi Ford v. State
This text of Kwambi Ford v. State (Kwambi Ford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DIVISION ELLINGTON, C. J., PHIPPS, P. J., and BRANCH, J.
NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/
April 23, 2013
In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A13A0394. FORD v. THE STATE.
PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.
Kwambi Ford filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of his motion
to dismiss his indictment based upon an alleged violation of his constitutional right
to a speedy trial. The Supreme Court of Georgia has recently ruled, however, that
such a claim is not directly appealable and that a defendant must follow the
interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).1 Ford’s appeal is therefore
dismissed.2
Appeal dismissed. Ellington, C. J., and Branch, J., concur.
1 Sosniak v. State, 292 Ga. 35, 36 (2) (734 SE2d 362) (2012); Morris v. State, 319 Ga. App. 198 (734 SE2d 926) (2012). 2 See Stevens v. State, 292 Ga. 218 (734 SE2d 743) (2012); Morris, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kwambi Ford v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kwambi-ford-v-state-gactapp-2013.