Kwai Wong v. David Beebe
This text of Kwai Wong v. David Beebe (Kwai Wong v. David Beebe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KWAI FUN WONG; WU-WEI TIEN No. 10-36136 TAO ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:01-cv-00718- v. JO
DAVID V. BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization ORDER Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees.
On Remand From The United States Supreme Court
Filed July 13, 2015
Before: Alex Kozinski, Harry Pregerson, A. Wallace Tashima, M. Margaret McKeown, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard R. Clifton, Jay S. Bybee, Carlos T. Bea, Milan D. Smith, Jr. and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges. 2 WONG V. BEEBE
ORDER
In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion affirming the judgment of this court and remanding for further proceedings, see United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, 135 S. Ct. 1625 (2015), we in turn REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinions of this court and the Supreme Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kwai-wong-v-david-beebe-ca9-2015.