Kwai Wong v. David Beebe

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kwai Wong v. David Beebe. Read the opinion of the Court — 732 F.3d 1030
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 13, 2015·No. 10-36136·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KWAI FUN WONG; WU-WEI TIEN No. 10-36136 TAO ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.

3:01-cv-00718-

v. JO

DAVID V. BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization ORDER Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellees.

On Remand From The United States Supreme Court

Filed July 13, 2015

Before: Alex Kozinski, Harry Pregerson, A. Wallace Tashima, M. Margaret McKeown, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon, Richard R. Clifton, Jay S. Bybee, Carlos T. Bea, Milan D. Smith, Jr. and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges.

2 WONG V. BEEBE

ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court’s opinion affirming the judgment of this court and remanding for further proceedings, see United States v. Kwai Fun Wong, 135 S. Ct. 1625 (2015), we in turn REMAND this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinions of this court and the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, (9th Cir. 2015).

Kwai Wong v. David Beebe (Kwai Wong v. David Beebe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Kwai Fun Wong
575 U.S. 402 (Supreme Court, 2015)