Kwai Wong v. David Beebe

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kwai Wong v. David Beebe. Read the opinion of the Court — 732 F.3d 1030
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 3, 2013·No. 10-36136·Published

Opinion

FILED FOR PUBLICATION JAN 03 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KWAI FUN WONG; WU-WEI TIEN No. 10-36136 TAO ASSOCIATION, D.C. No. 3:01-cv-00718-JO Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v. ORDER

DAVID V. BEEBE, a former Immigration and Naturalization Service (n.k.a. Department of Homeland Security) Official; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants - Appellees.

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35–3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kwai Wong v. David Beebe, (9th Cir. 2013).

Kwai Wong v. David Beebe (Kwai Wong v. David Beebe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.