K.W. v. Carlsbad Unified School District

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedAugust 11, 2025
Docket3:25-cv-00649
StatusUnknown

This text of K.W. v. Carlsbad Unified School District (K.W. v. Carlsbad Unified School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
K.W. v. Carlsbad Unified School District, (S.D. Cal. 2025).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 K.W., a minor, by and through her Case No.: 25-cv-0649-JES-DEB mother, NEKAIYA WILSON, 12 ORDER GRANTING JOINT Plaintiff, 13 MOTION TO CONTINUE [DKT. NO. v. 24] AND NOTICE AND ORDER 14 SETTING EARLY NEUTRAL CARLSBAD UNIFIED SCHOOL 15 EVALUATION AND CASE DISTRICT, et al. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES 16

Defendants. 17

18 19 At the parties’ request and with good cause appearing, the Court GRANTS the 20 parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) and Case 21 Management Conference (“CMC”). Dkt. No. 24 (Joint Mot. to Continue). 22 The August 20, 2025 ENE is VACATED and RESET for September 12, 2025 at 23 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher. In the event the case does not settle 24 during the ENE, the Court will hold a CMC pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) immediately 25 following the conclusion of the ENE. 26 The following are mandatory guidelines for the parties preparing for the ENE. 27 Absent express permission obtained from this Court, counsel must timely comply with the 28 dates and deadlines herein. 1 1. Review of Chambers Rules: Counsel must refer to the Civil Local Rules, 2 the undersigned’s Chambers Rules for Civil Cases, as well as the Chambers Rules of the 3 assigned District Judge, which are accessible via the Court’s website at 4 www.casd.uscourts.gov. 5 2. Purpose of the ENE: The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal 6 discussion between the attorneys, parties, and the Magistrate Judge of every aspect of the 7 lawsuit in an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. Counsel attending the ENE 8 are expected to have a command of the facts and applicable law. Counsel and the parties 9 must be prepared to engage in a detailed discussion of the merits of their respective cases 10 and engage in good faith settlement discussions. All discussions during the ENE are 11 informal, off the record, privileged and confidential. Counsel for any non-English 12 speaking party is responsible for arranging for the appearance of an interpreter at the 13 conference. 14 3. Full Settlement Authority Is Required: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1.c.1, all 15 parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured parties, and the 16 principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation must participate in the ENE.2 This 17 appearance must be made with full and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a 18 binding settlement.3 In the case of a corporate entity, an authorized representative of the 19

20 1 As used herein, references to “counsel” or “attorney(s)” include any party 21 representing himself or herself.

22 2 The attendance requirement includes parties that are indemnified by others. Any 23 deviation from this Order requires prior Court approval.

24 3 Full authority to settle means that the individuals at the ENE Conference are 25 authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 26 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” 27 to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485-486 (D. Ariz. 2003). One of the purposes of requiring a person with unlimited 28 1 corporation who is not retained outside counsel must be present and must have 2 discretionary authority to commit the company to pay an amount up to the amount of the 3 plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damage prayers). The purpose of this requirement is 4 to have representatives present who can settle the case during the course of the conference 5 without consulting a superior. 6 Counsel for a government entity may be excused from this requirement so long as 7 the government attorney who participates in the ENE (1) has primary responsibility for 8 handling the case; and (2) may negotiate settlement offers that the attorney is willing to 9 recommend to the government official having ultimate settlement authority. 10 4. Substantiation Requirement for Demand for Attorney Fees: During the 11 ENE, Plaintiff's counsel must be prepared to present for in camera review documentation 12 supporting the amount of attorneys' fees and costs claimed. 13 5. Procedure for Zoom Videoconference Appearance: The Court will use its 14 Zoom4 video conferencing account to hold the ENE. 5 Prior to the start of the ENE, the 15 16 17 altered during the face-to-face conference. Pitman, 216 F.R.D. at 486. Limited or sum 18 certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595-597 19 (8th Cir. 2001).

20 4 If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on computers through a 21 download on the Zoom website (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the installation of a free app. Joining a Zoom conference does not require creating a Zoom 22 account, but it does require downloading the .exe file (if using a computer) or the app (if 23 using a mobile device). Participants are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom and familiarize themselves with Zoom in advance of the ENE. There is a cost-free option for 24 creating a Zoom account. For help getting started with Zoom, visit: 25 https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/categories/200101697-Getting-Started.

26 5 Counsel may request the ENE and CMC be converted to an in-person appearance 27 informally through a joint call or email to the Court’s chambers (efile_butcher@casd.uscourts.gov). Counsel must meet and confer prior to making such a 28 1 Court will email counsel an invitation with the Zoom meeting hyperlink and password to 2 participate in the ENE.6 3 Each participant should plan to join the Zoom video conference at least five minutes 4 before the start of the ENE to ensure that the conference begins on time. Zoom’s 5 functionalities will allow the Court to conduct the ENE as it ordinarily would conduct an 6 in-person one. The Court will divide participants into separate, confidential sessions, which 7 Zoom calls Breakout Rooms.7 In a Breakout Room, the Court will be able to confidentially 8 and individually communicate with participants. Breakout Rooms will also allow parties 9 and counsel to communicate confidentially outside the presence of the Court. 10 Counsel are responsible for ensuring their clients are able to participate in the ENE. 11 All participants must display the same level of professionalism and attention during the 12 ENE as if they were attending in person (e.g., not be driving while speaking to the Court, 13 or otherwise distracted). Participants are encouraged to use laptops or desktop computers 14 for the video conference, if possible, as mobile devices often offer inferior performance. 15 Because Zoom may quickly deplete the battery of a participant’s device, each participant 16 should ensure that their device is plugged in or that a charging cable is readily available 17 during the video conference. 18 6. Pre-ENE Meet and Confer & ENE Statement Requirements: Based upon 19 the Court's familiarity with cases brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act 20 (“ADA”), and in the interest of promoting the just, efficient, and economical determination 21 of this action, the Court issues the following orders: 22 23 24

25 6 Participants who do not have Zoom already installed on their device when they click on the Zoom meeting hyperlink will be prompted to download and install Zoom before 26 proceeding. 27 7 For more information on what to expect when participating in a Zoom Breakout 28 1 a.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
K.W. v. Carlsbad Unified School District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kw-v-carlsbad-unified-school-district-casd-2025.