KW Excavation, Inc.

CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah
DecidedNovember 7, 2023
Docket22-21925
StatusUnknown

This text of KW Excavation, Inc. (KW Excavation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
KW Excavation, Inc., (Utah 2023).

Opinion

This order is SIGNED. □□□□

Dated: November 6, 2023 ill 1 hearer Ae □□ : = (ea □□□ ow J: □□ Sine □□ hehe) VV WILLIAM T. THURMAN CaO U.S. Bankruptcy Judge So msc

Knute Rife (USB No. 4756) Rife Law Office PO Box 2941 Salt Lake City, UT 84110 Telephone: 801-809-9986 Email: KARife@RifeLegal.com Attorney for Debtor UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CISTRICT OF UTA In re KW Excavation, Inc., Case No. 22-21925 Chapter 11 Debtor, Judge William T. Thurman Address: PO Box 1043 Kaysville, UT 84037

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW REGARDING CONFIRMATION OF DEBTOR’S AMENDED PLAN DATED 15 JULY 2023 UNDER SUBCHAPTER V OF CHAPTER 11 This matter came before the Court on 26 October 2023 at 2:00 p.m. (“Confirmation Hearing”) to consider confirmation of Debtor’s Amended Chapter 11 Plan Dated 15 July 2023 (“Amended Plan”) (Docket No. 153, as modified by (i) the Debtor’s Notice of Plan Corrections/Updates, Docket No. 166 (the “Correction Notice”), and (11) Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation’s (“Caterpillar Financial”) Response

to Debtor’s Amended Chapter 11 Plan Dated July 15, 2023 (the “CAT Financial Response”), Docket No. 167 [collectively, with the Amended Plan and the Correction Notice, the “Plan”, as it may be modified by the Confirmation Order) filed by KW Excavation Inc., debtor and debtor-in-possession (“Debtor”) in this bankruptcy case (“Case”) under Subchapter V of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code

(“Bankruptcy Code”). Knute Rife appeared on behalf of Debtor. Other counsel and parties-in-interest noted their appearances on the record. Based upon the evidence received at the Confirmation Hearing, the Plan, Debtor’s Report of Balloting on Plan (Ballot Report, Docket No. 110), the Declaration of Janeice Whitaker in Support of Confirmation (“Whitaker Declaration”, Docket No. 168), and the facts stated therein, the absence of any objections to confirmation of the Plan, the statements and arguments of counsel and other matters of record, and good cause having been shown, the Court enters the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this Case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§157 and

1334. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1408 and 1409. Confirmation of the Plan is a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §157(b)(2), and this Court has jurisdiction to determine whether the Plan complies with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and should be confirmed. 2. This Court takes judicial notice of the docket of the Case, including all pleadings, papers, and other documents filed, all orders entered, and the transcripts and minute entries of all hearings heard in this Case.

2 3. Timely notice of the Plan was sent to all creditors in the Case, and notice of the confirmation hearing has been adequate to allow the Court to proceed with the Confirmation Hearing. The Plan, notice of the Plan and Confirmation Hearing, notices of continuances of the Confirmation Hearing, and relevant ballots were served in

compliance with the Bankruptcy Code and related rules upon creditors and holders of equity interests entitled to vote on the Plan, and such transmittal and service were sufficient. 4. Pursuant to §1181(b), §1125 and its disclosure statement requirements do not apply in this Case. Debtor’s solicitation and tabulation of ballots complied with the requirements for this Court to conclude that the solicitation process has proceeded in “good faith” within the meaning of §1125, and Debtor and its agents are entitled to the projections of §1125(e). 5. The Plan establishes five classes of claims. The ballots received were in Class B-1 and voted in favor of the Plan. No votes were cast in the C-1 and C-2 Classes, and

therefore those classes are deemed to have accepted the Plan. There were no dissenting votes from any creditor on the issue of Plan confirmation. All Classes have either accepted the Plan by affirmative vote or are deemed to have accepted the Plan pursuant to the terms of the Plan and the holding in In re Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc., 836 F.2d 1263 (10th Cir. 1988), and the Plan therefore complies with §1129(a)(8). 6. Pursuant to §103(i), Debtor (a) is a “debtor” as defined in §1182, and (b) elected that Subchapter V of the Chapter shall apply to this case. Further:

3 a. Debtor is engaged in commercial activities, and has aggregate noncontingent liquidated secured and unsecured debts as of the Petition Date of not more than $7,500,000.00, not less than 50% of which arise from the commercial activities of Debtor.

b. Debtor is not a person whose primary activity is the business of owning single asset real estate. c. Debtor is not part of an affiliated group of companies or debtors.

d. Debtor is not subject to the reporting requirements of §§13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 nor is an affiliate of an issuer as defined therein. 7. The Plan complies with §1129(a)(1) in that it complies with the applicable provisions of Title 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, including as follows: a. Proper Classification. As required by §1123(a)(1), Article V of the Plan properly designates classes of Claims and classifies only substantially similar claims in the same classes pursuant to §1122. b. Specify Unimpaired Classes. Classes A-1 and A-2 are unimpaired under the Plan and are deemed to have accepted the Plan. c. Specify Treatment of Impaired Classes. Classes B-1, C-1, and C-2 are designated as impaired under the Plan. Article V of the Plan specifies the treatment of the impaired classes of claims, thereby satisfying §1123(a)(3). d. No Discrimination. The Plan provides for similar treatment for each claim or interest in each class unless the holder of a particular claim has agreed to less favorable treatment with respect to that claim, thereby satisfying §1123(a)(4).

4 e. Implementation of the Plan. The Plan provides adequate and proper means for implementation, thereby satisfying §1123(a)(5). Among other things, Articles V, VI, and XII provide for (a) the vesting of estate property in Reorganized Debtor; (b) ownership and management structure of Reorganized Debtor; (c) Reorganized

Debtor’s use and retention of property; and (d) distributions to creditors. f. Corporate Ownership. Debtor has one shareholder, and Reorganized Debtor shall continue that corporate structure for the duration of the Plan, in compliance with §1123(a)(6). g. Ongoing Management. Janeice Whitaker has agreed to continue as management of Reorganized Debtor, and nothing contained in the Plan is inconsistent with the interests of creditors and interest-holders, or with public policy, with respect to the manner of selection of future officers, directors, or trustees, as required by §1123(a)(7). h. Additional Plan Provisions. The Plan’s provisions are appropriate and

consistent with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, including provisions regarding (a) assumption and rejection of executory contracts and unexpired leases, and (b) the retention, enforcement, and/or abandonment of claims upon confirmation, satisfying §1123(b). i. Bankruptcy Rule 3016(a). The Plan is dated and identifies Debtor as its proponent, satisfying Bankruptcy Rule 3016(a). j. Filing of the Plan. Debtor filed the original draft of its Plan on 24 August 2022 and amended the Plan on 13 January 2023 and 15 July 2023 satisfying §1189.

5 k. Contents of the Plan.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
KW Excavation, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kw-excavation-inc-utb-2023.