Kutz v. Fankhanel

608 So. 2d 873, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 1992·No. No. 91-2059·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and COWART, J., concur. W. SHARP, J., concurs and concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kutz v. Fankhanel, 608 So. 2d 873, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 873 (Kutz v. Fankhanel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Ortega
948 So. 2d 855 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Dept. of Health and Human Services ex rel. Jones v. Jones
623 S.E.2d 272 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Fankhanel v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 403 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Department of Revenue v. Hall
699 So. 2d 1036 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Pyne v. Black
650 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McClish v. Lee
633 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Kutz v. Fankhanel
608 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)