Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Kutz v. Fankhanel

Kutz v. Fankhanel

608 So. 2d 873, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 23, 1992
DocketNo. 91-2059
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 608 So. 2d 873 (Kutz v. Fankhanel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kutz v. Fankhanel, 608 So. 2d 873, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and COWART, J., concur. W. SHARP, J., concurs and concurs specially with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE v. Ortega
948 So. 2d 855 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Dept. of Health and Human Services ex rel. Jones v. Jones
623 S.E.2d 272 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Fankhanel v. Commissioner
1998 T.C. Memo. 403 (U.S. Tax Court, 1998)
Department of Revenue v. Hall
699 So. 2d 1036 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Pyne v. Black
650 So. 2d 1073 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
McClish v. Lee
633 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Kutz v. Fankhanel
608 So. 2d 873 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 873, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kutz-v-fankhanel-fladistctapp-1992.