Kushlin v. Bialer
257 N.E.2d 293, 26 N.Y.2d 748, 309 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1592
Opinion
Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order, entered in the action itself, staying such action pending arbitration, does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see American Reserve Ins. Co. v. China Ins. Co., 298 N. Y. 915; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, p. 129, n. 11; cf. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Griesenbeck, 21 N Y 2d 688).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kushlin v. Bialer, 257 N.E.2d 293, 26 N.Y.2d 748, 309 N.Y.S.2d 47, 1970 N.Y. LEXIS 1592 (N.Y. 1970).
257 N.E.2d 293 (Kushlin v. Bialer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Friedman v. Hebrew Home for the Aged
65 N.E.3d 1283 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
Berg v. Dimson
529 N.E.2d 174 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
Lewis v. Finnerty
417 N.E.2d 91 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Ross v. Specialty Insulation Manufacturing Co.
96 Misc. 2d 940 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.
301 N.E.2d 551 (New York Court of Appeals, 1973)