Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.
301 N.E.2d 551, 33 N.Y.2d 632, 347 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1102
This text of 301 N.E.2d 551 (Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co., 301 N.E.2d 551, 33 N.Y.2d 632, 347 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1102 (N.Y. 1973).
Opinion
Motion dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (See Kushlin v. Bialer, 26 NY 2d 748.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kushlin v. Bialer
257 N.E.2d 293 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
301 N.E.2d 551, 33 N.Y.2d 632, 347 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coenen-v-r-w-pressprich-co-ny-1973.