Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.
301 N.E.2d 551, 33 N.Y.2d 632, 347 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1102
Opinion
Motion dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. (See Kushlin v. Bialer, 26 NY 2d 748.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co., 301 N.E.2d 551, 33 N.Y.2d 632, 347 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1973 N.Y. LEXIS 1102 (N.Y. 1973).
301 N.E.2d 551 (Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kushlin v. Bialer
257 N.E.2d 293 (New York Court of Appeals, 1970)