Kurtz v. Town of Amherst

244 A.D.2d 895, 665 N.Y.S.2d 129
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the petition, found a referendum petition invalid and directed its removal from the ballot. The petition is invalid because the preamble fails to comply with the statutory requirement that the voter state that his “present place of residence is truly stated opposite [his] signature” (Election Law § 6-140 [1] [a]; see, Election Law § 1-102; Town Law § 91; see generally, Matter of Graham v City Clerk of City of Ogdensburg, 104 AD2d 703; Matter of Lindley v Babylon Town Clerk, 80 AD2d 879, affd 53 NY2d 683; Heath v Town of Islip, 169 Misc 2d 382). In light of our decision, we do not reach the par[896]*896ties’ remaining contentions. (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Mahoney, J.—Election Law.) Present— Pine, J. P., Lawton, Hayes, Wisner and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kurtz v. Town of Amherst, 244 A.D.2d 895, 665 N.Y.S.2d 129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 895 (Kurtz v. Town of Amherst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rust v. Town of Hamburg
2025 NY Slip Op 51805(U) (New York Supreme Court, Erie County, 2025)
Fisher v. Sampson
27 A.D.3d 560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)