Kurt Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 18, 2016·No. 15-4253·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

KURT SHANNON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D15-4253

HILLSBOROUGH AREA CORRECTED PAGES: pg 1 REGIONAL TRANSIT AND CORRECTION IS UNDERLINED IN COMMERCIAL RISK RED MANAGEMENT, MAILED: October 7, 2016 BY: KMS Appellees.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Ellen H. Lorenzen, Judge.

Date of Accident: December 6, 2013.

Michael J. Winer of the Law Office of Michael J. Winer, Tampa, and Manuel G. Franco of the Franco Law Firm, LLC, Tampa, for Appellant.

Katherine Stone and Steven E. Hovsepian of Barbas, Nunez, Sanders, Butler & Hovsepian, Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The court having received the August 24, 2016, order of the Supreme Court

of Florida quashing this court’s opinion of February 19, 2016, and remanding the matter for reconsideration upon application of Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 192

So. 3d 431 (Fla. 2016), and finding that reversal is warranted in light of that opinion,

the order of the Judge of Compensation Claims is REVERSED and this case is

REMANDED for proceedings consistent with that opinion.

WOLF, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kurt Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Kurt Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (Kurt Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marvin Castellanos v. Next Door Company
192 So. 3d 431 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)