Kurt Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit
This text of Kurt Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit (Kurt Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
KURT SHANNON, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-4253
HILLSBOROUGH AREA REGIONAL TRANSIT AND COMMERCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT,
Appellees.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed February 19, 2016.
An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Ellen H. Lorenzen, Judge.
Date of Accident: December 6, 2013.
Michael J. Winer of the Law Office of Michael J. Winers, Tampa, and Manuel G. Franco of the Franco Law Firm, LLC, Tampa, for Appellant.
Katherine Stone and Steven E. Hovsepian of Barbas, Nunez, Sanders, Butler & Hovsepian, Tampa, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 124 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013),
we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castellanos. Id. at 394. See Jollie v. State,
405 So. 2d 418, 421 n.* (Fla. 1981).
WOLF, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kurt Shannon v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurt-shannon-v-hillsborough-area-regional-transit-fladistctapp-2016.