Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc.

59 P.2d 205, 15 Cal. App. 2d 762
California Court of Appeal·Decided June 27, 1936·No. Civ. No. 10909·Published

Opinion

15 Cal.App.2d 762 (1936)

SAMUEL L. KURLAND, Appellant,
v.
FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Respondents.

Civ. No. 10909.

California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.

June 27, 1936.

Don M. Kitzmiller and F. D. R. Moote for Appellant.

Call & Murphey, Robert B. Murphey, Alex W. Davis, Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe and Vincent Morgan for Respondents.

Memorandum

McComb, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to plaintiff's complaint, which alleged that defendant had libeled plaintiff.

[1] On a similar set of facts we have this day decided in the case of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., Civil No. 10908 (ante p. 77 [59 PaCal.2d 203]) the identical questions of law involved in the instant case.

Therefore on the authority of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Crail, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., 59 P.2d 205, 15 Cal. App. 2d 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

59 P.2d 205 (Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass'n
59 P.2d 205 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)