Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc.
This text of 59 P.2d 205 (Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SAMUEL L. KURLAND, Appellant,
v.
FOREST LAWN MEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Respondents.
California Court of Appeals. Second Appellate District, Division Two.
Don M. Kitzmiller and F. D. R. Moote for Appellant.
Call & Murphey, Robert B. Murphey, Alex W. Davis, Hill, Morgan & Bledsoe and Vincent Morgan for Respondents.
Memorandum
McComb, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to plaintiff's complaint, which alleged that defendant had libeled plaintiff.
[1] On a similar set of facts we have this day decided in the case of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., Civil No. 10908 (ante p. 77 [59 PaCal.2d 203]) the identical questions of law involved in the instant case.
Therefore on the authority of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Crail, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 P.2d 205, 15 Cal. App. 2d 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kurland-v-forest-lawn-memorial-park-association-in-calctapp-1936.