Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass'n

59 P.2d 205, 15 Cal. App. 2d 762, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 141

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 27, 1936

DocketCiv. No. 10909

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 P.2d 205 (Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kurland v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Ass'n, 59 P.2d 205, 15 Cal. App. 2d 762, 1936 Cal. App. LEXIS 141 (Cal. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court sustained a demurrer without leave to amend to plaintiff’s complaint, which alleged that defendant had libeled plaintiff.

On a similar set of facts we have this day decided in the case of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., Civil No. 10908 (ante, p. 77 [59 Pac. (2d) 203]) the identical questions of law involved in the instant case.

Therefore on the authority of Pollard v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park Association, Inc., supra, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Grail, P. J., and Wood, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on August 24, 1936.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI