Kurdi v. California Department of Transportation

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 MAISA KURDI, Case No. 1:22-cv-00729-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING NOTICE OF UNAVAILABITY 12 v. (ECF No. 30) TRANSPORTATION, 14 Defendant. 15

16 Plaintiff filed this civil action on June 15, 2022, and a case schedule has been entered. 17 (ECF Nos. 1, 29). Pertinent here, a mid-discovery status conference is set for September 27, 2023, 18 at 10:30 a.m., with the requirement that the parties file a joint status report at least seven days 19 before the conference. (ECF No. 29, p. 3). This matter is now before the Court on the notice of 20 unavailability of Plaintiff’s counsel, filed by Attorney John Shepardson. (ECF No. 30). The notice 21 states, in pertinent part, as follows: 22 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that from 8/5/23 to 9/28/23, John A. Shepardson will be unavailable for any purposes, including, but not limited to, receiving notice 23 of any kind, appearing in court, responding to ex parte applications, or attending 24 depositions. I am filing this Notice of Unavailability with as much advance notice as possible. I am serving a copy of this Notice of Unavailability to all parties and 25 attorneys involved in the above case. 26 You are advised to read Tenderloin Housing Clinic v. Sparks I (1992), 8 Cal. App. 4th 299, regarding the availability of sanctions for purposefully scheduling a 27 conflicting proceeding without good cause. 28 (Id. at 1). 1 This notice effectively means that counsel will not be appearing at the September 27, 2023 2 | mid-discovery status conference or participating in the joint status report due at least seven days 3 | before the conference. However, “absent a court order, a notice of unavailability does not operate 4 || to, in effect, stay the litigation of a case.” Electracash, Inc. v. Kahn, No. CV-051135-RSWL 5 (FMOx), 2006 WL 8434675, at *3 (C.D. Cal. July 10, 2006); see PLU Invs., LLC v. Intraspect 6 Grp., Inc., No. C10-626RSL, 2010 WL 4094335, at *2 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 14, 2010) (“A party 7 | may not modify the Court’s motion calendar by filing a notice of unavailability.”). 8 In short, should counsel seek to be relieved of any court-imposed requirement, counsel

9 must file an appropriate motion, not a notice of unavailability. However, as a courtesy to counsel, the Court will continue the mid-discovery status 8 conference. Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 12 1. The mid-discovery status conference set for September 27, 2023, is continued to October 13 12, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. 2. The parties are permitted to appear telephonically and may do so by dialing 1-888-251- 15 2909 and entering access code 1024453. 16 3. At least seven (7) court days of the conference, the parties are directed to file a joint 17 report, of up to five (5) pages, outlining the status of the case, any additional discovery 18 still planned, potential for settlement, and any other issues pending that would benefit 19 from the Court's assistance/direction. 20 > IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 | Dated: _ August 8, 2023 [see ey 3 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28