Kupstis v. Michaud

573 A.2d 315, 214 Conn. 801, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 71

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 8, 1990·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 425, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the attorney referee’s delay in issuing his report violate (a) General Statutes § 51-183b; (b) applicable provisions of the Practice Book; or (c) the due process [768]*768rights of the plaintiff under the United States constitution or article first, § 10, of the Connecticut constitution?”

Decided February 8, 1990 Michael A. D’Amico, in support of the petition. Robert J. Crean, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 20 Conn. App. 425, is granted, limited to the following issue:

Decided February 8, 1990 Michael A. D’Amico, in support of the petition. Robert J. Crean, in opposition.

Kupstis v. Michaud, 573 A.2d 315, 214 Conn. 801, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 71 (Colo. 1990).

Pincite

573 A.2d 315 (Kupstis v. Michaud) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Caruso v. Caruso, No. Cv 02 0465379 (Feb. 19, 2003)

2003 Conn. Super. Ct. 2790-t (Connecticut Superior Court, 2003)

Frank v. Frank, No. 094162 (Apr. 22, 1992)

1992 Conn. Super. Ct. 3684 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1992)

Kupstis v. Michaud

576 A.2d 152 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)

Opinion

Related