Kuloschik v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.

163 A.D. 938
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kuloschik v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 147 N.Y.S. 1121

Opinion

Per Curiam:

There was nothing presented to the court below that justified the preference of this case over other cases on the calendar awaiting trial. The order appealed from should, therefore, be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied. Present— Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuloschik v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp., 163 A.D. 938 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

163 A.D. 938 (Kuloschik v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.