Kuloschik v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.

147 N.Y.S. 1121
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 5, 1914·No. No. 5961·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAB1.

There was nothing presented to the court below that justified the preference of this case over other eases on the calendar awaiting trial. The order appealed from should therefore be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuloschik v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp., 147 N.Y.S. 1121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

147 N.Y.S. 1121 (Kuloschik v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barnett v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.
150 N.Y.S. 1076 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)