Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided January 22, 2020·No. 3:19-cv-00369·Unknown

Opinion

WADE □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ LO YWULUICI Co CHOU UAL icy Faye LU?

} AARON D. FORD __ FILED ______ RECEIVED Attorney General ___ ENTERED —_——— SERVED ON CARRIE L. PARKER (Bar No. 10952) COUNSEL/PARTIES OF RECORD Deputy Attorney General KEVIN A. PICK (Bar No. 11683) 4 Senior Deputy Attorney General JAN 22 2020 State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 5420 Kietzke Lane, Suite 202 CLERK US DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Reno, NV 89511 BY: DEPUTY (775) 687-2110 —————__====== (775) 688-1822 (fax) Email: cparker@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendant State of Nevada, ex rel. its Department of Transportation UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

JENNIFER KUKLOCK, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:19-cv-00369-LRH-CLB vs. STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. its TIV RDER DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant. Plaintiff, JENNIFER KUKLOCK, by and through her counsel of record, Benson Law, 1|LLC, and Kevin Benson, Esq.; and Defendant, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (NDOT), by and through its attorneys, AARON D. FORD, Attorney General for the State of Nevada; CARRIE L. PARKER, Deputy Attorney General; and KEVIN A. PICK, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate to the following terms of this Stipulated Protective Order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by the parties in connection with this case: l. Confidential Information. Any party or non-party may designate as “CONFIDENTIAL” (by stamping the relevant page or otherwise set forth herein) any document

NAD SB VM TNE TN he □□□ □□□ RIN RIE eM

or response to discovery which that party or non-party considers in good faith to contain information including, but not limited to, trade secrets, proprietary data, marketing information, i financial information, personnel information, and/or similar commercially sensitive information of the type contemplated by Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Nevada law (‘Confidential Information”). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which confidential information appears shall be so designated. 2. Designating Material as Confidential. A party or non-party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in response to written discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” by so indicating in said response. Or a party or non-party may designate in writing, within thirty (30) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as confidential information. Any other party may object to such proposal, in writing or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated according to the designation until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 10 below, and counsel for all parties shall be responsible for making all previously unmarked copies of the designated material in their possession or control with the specific designation. 3. Use of Confidential Information. All information produced or exchanged in the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used by the party or parties to whom the information is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 4, Disclosure of Confidential Information. Except with the prior written consent of other parties, or upon the prior order of this Court obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any person other than: a. counsel for the respective parties to this litigation and co-counsel retained for this litigation, including partners and associates who assist them in this matter, Bureau Chiefs, Chief Deputy Attorneys General, Senior Deputy Attorneys //1

WASD □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ LD WUULUINCI Co Udit ticgyv Fayt vv gy

General, Deputy Attorneys General, paralegals, clerical and secretarial staff employed by such counsel; b. individual parties, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, to the extent deemed necessary by counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; c. non-party consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification annexed to this Order as Exhibit “A” (which shall be retained by counsel to the party so disclosing the confidential information and made available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after the termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of the Court) before being shown or given any confidential information; d. any authors or recipients of the confidential information; e. the Court, Court personnel, court reporters, and videographers; f. witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(d)). A witness shall sign the Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification only in a deposition at which the party who designated the Confidential Information is represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. g. Members of the jury in this case; h. Professional vendors that provide litigation support services, employees of independent copy services, printers or illustrators, for the sole purpose of making copies of documents and exhibits to be used in this litigation; i. Such other persons as Plaintiff and Defendant may agree upon in writing; and j. Such other persons as the Court may order upon application of Plaintiff or Defendant.

MADDY SAM VM SURRENDER REI DIR I Te AY PV

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation, (D. Nev. 2020).

Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation (Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)