Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJanuary 21, 2020
Docket3:19-cv-00369
StatusUnknown

This text of Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation (Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation, (D. Nev. 2020).

Opinion

WADE VE AUVOYUYOYUT WUUUINOIN et Pe Ui Payee tVigd

| || AARON D. FORD FILED ~~ _ RECEIVED Attorney General —— ENTERED —-. SERVED ON 2 || CARRIE L. PARKER (Bar No. 10952) COUNSEUPARTIES OF RECORD Deputy Attorney General 3 || KEVIN A. PICK (Bar No. 11683) Senior Deputy Attorney General JAN 21 toed | 4 || State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 5 || 5420 Kietzke Lane, Suite 202 ISTRICT COURT Reno, NV 89511 Ry EVADA 6 || (775) 687-2110 ————————. DEPUTY (775) 688-1822 (fax) 7 || Email: cparker@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendant State of Nevada, 8 || ex rel. its Department of Transportation 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 D JENNIFER KUKLOCK, 13 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:19-cv-00369-LRH-CLB VS. 14 STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel. its STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 15 |} DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OT 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, JENNIFER KUKLOCK, by and through her counsel of record, Benson Law, 21 ||LLC, and Kevin Benson, Esq.; and Defendant, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF 22 || TRANSPORTATION (NDOT), by and through its attorneys, AARON D. FORD, Attorney 23 || General for the State of Nevada; CARRIE L. PARKER, Deputy Attorney General; and KEVIN 24 || A. PICK, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby stipulate to the following terms of this 25 || Stipulated Protective Order to protect the confidentiality of confidential information obtained by 26 || the parties in connection with this case: 27 1. Confidential Information. Any party or non-party may designate as 28 || “CONFIDENTIAL” (by stamping the relevant page or otherwise set forth herein) any document

VASES □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ VUUCUTTICIN CL PUCU UL hicgy Tayo could”?

I || or response to discovery which that party or non-party considers in good faith to contain 2 || information including, but not limited to, trade secrets, proprietary data, marketing information, 3 || financial information, personnel information, and/or similar commercially sensitive information 4 || of the type contemplated by Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Nevada law 5 || (‘Confidential Information”). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, 6 || the first page and each page on which confidential information appears shall be so designated. 7 2, Designating Material as Confidential. A party or non-party may designate 8 || information disclosed during a deposition or in response to written discovery as 9 || “CONFIDENTIAL” by so indicating in said response. Or a party or non-party may designate in 10 || writing, within thirty (30) days after receipt of said responses or of the deposition transcript for 11 || which the designation is proposed, that specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses 12 || be treated as confidential information. Any other party may object to such proposal, in writing 13 || or on the record. Upon such objection, the parties shall follow the procedures described in 14 || paragraph 8 below. After any designation made according to the procedure set forth in this 15 |] paragraph, the designated documents or information shall be treated according to the designation 16 || until the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 10 below, and 17 || counsel for all parties shall be responsible for making all previously unmarked copies of the 18 || designated material in their possession or control with the specific designation. 19 3. Use of Confidential Information. All information produced or exchanged in 20 || the course of this case (other than information that is publicly available) shall be used by the 21 || party or parties to whom the information is produced solely for the purpose of this case. 22 4. Disclosure of Confidential Information. Except with the prior written consent 23 || of other parties, or upon the prior order of this Court obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, 24 || Confidential Information shall not be disclosed to any person other than: 25 a. counsel for the respective parties to this litigation and co-counsel retained for this 26 litigation, including partners and associates who assist them in this matter, 27 Bureau Chiefs, Chief Deputy Attorneys General, Senior Deputy Attorneys 28 ///

WASE DLITUVIUUODSZZ-L ATTY LD WUUUITOIN CL TOU Ua Taye

l General, Deputy Attorneys General, paralegals, clerical and secretarial staff 2 employed by such counsel; 3 b. individual parties, class representatives, any officer or employee of a party, to the 4 extent deemed necessary by counsel for the prosecution or defense of this 5 litigation; 6 ¢. non-party consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense 7 of this litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the 8 Certification annexed to this Order as Exhibit “A” (which shall be retained by 9 counsel to the party so disclosing the confidential information and made 10 available for inspection by opposing counsel during the pendency or after the 11 termination of the action only upon good cause shown and upon order of the 12 Court) before being shown or given any confidential information; 13 d. any authors or recipients of the confidential information; 14 e. the Court (under seal), Court personnel, court reporters, and videographers, 15 f. witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(d)). A witness shall sign 16 the Certification before being shown a confidential document. Confidential 17 Information may be disclosed to a witness who will not sign the Certification 18 only in a deposition at which the party who designated the Confidential 19 Information is represented or has been given notice that Confidential Information 20 shall be designated “Confidential” pursuant to paragraph 2 above. Witnesses 21 shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 22 g. Members of the jury in this case; 23 h. Professional vendors that provide litigation support services, employees of 24 independent copy services, printers or illustrators, for the sole purpose of making 25 copies of documents and exhibits to be used in this litigation; 26 i. Such other persons as Plaintiff and Defendant may agree upon in writing; and 27 j. Such other persons as the Court may order upon application of Plaintiff or 28 Defendant.

MAOH SAD VERIMED I Ee TAY TV

l 5. Notice of Stipulated Protective Order. Any persons receiving or being shown 2 || Confidential Information shall be advised that the Confidential Information is being disclosed 3 || pursuant to an Order of the Court and that they shall not reveal or discuss such information to or 4 || with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except as set forth herein. 5 6. Filing of Confidential Information. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule 6 jlor prior court order, papers filed with the Court under seal shall be accompanied by a 7 |; contemporaneous motion for leave to file those documents under seal, and shall be filed 8 || consistent with Local Rule IA 10-5 and the Court’s electronic filing procedures. 9 || Notwithstanding any agreement among the parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal 10 || bears the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in 11 |] court. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.2d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006); Pintos v. 12 || Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2010); see also Center for Auto Safety v. 13 || Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1097 (9th Cir. 2016). 14 Further, pursuant to Local Rule IA 10-5(d), documents filed under seal in this case must 15 || be served in accordance with Local Rule IC 4-1(c). 16 7.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kuklock v. Nevada Department Of Transportation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuklock-v-nevada-department-of-transportation-nvd-2020.