Kukla v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.

2016 Ark. App. 287
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedMay 25, 2016
DocketCV-16-94
StatusPublished

This text of 2016 Ark. App. 287 (Kukla v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kukla v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs., 2016 Ark. App. 287 (Ark. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 287

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION III No. CV-16-94

BRIAN J. KUKLA Opinion Delivered May 25, 2016 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE SEBASTIAN V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FORT SMITH DISTRICT [NO. JV-2011-579]

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HONORABLE JIM D. SPEARS, HUMAN SERVICES AND MINOR JUDGE CHILD APPELLEES AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

PHILLIP T. WHITEAKER, Judge

Appellant Brian Kukla appeals from a Sebastian County Circuit Court order

terminating his parental rights to his son, B.K. (d/o/b 09/29/10).1 His attorney has filed a

motion to withdraw as counsel that is accompanied by a brief filed pursuant to Arkansas

Supreme Court Rule 6-9 and Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services, 359 Ark.

131, 194 S.W.3d 739 (2004), in which counsel argues that there are no issues of arguable

merit for appeal. Mr. Kukla was given an opportunity to file pro se points for reversal but did

not do so.

After carefully examining the record and the no-merit brief, we hold that Mr. Kukla’s

counsel has complied with the requirements for no-merit parental-termination appeals and

that the appeal is wholly without merit. Accordingly, we affirm by memorandum opinion the

1 The order also terminated the parental rights of Jacqueline Kukla, B.K.’s mother. She has not appealed the order terminating her parental rights and is not a party to this appeal. Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 287

termination of Mr. Kukla’s parental rights. See In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301,

700 S.W.2d 63 (1985); Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 5-2(e) (2015). We also grant counsel’s motion to

withdraw from representation of Mr. Kukla.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

HARRISON and BROWN, JJ., agree.

Leah Lanford, Arkansas Public Defender Commission, for appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
194 S.W.3d 739 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2004)
In Re Memorandum Opinions
700 S.W.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2016 Ark. App. 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kukla-v-ark-dept-of-human-servs-arkctapp-2016.