Kuiken v. State

16 So. 3d 875, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8542, 2009 WL 1766711
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 2009·No. 3D07-152·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Jackson v. State, 2 So.3d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Bloodsaw v. State, 949 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Cf. Rodriguez v. State, 982 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). See also § 90.404(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kuiken v. State, 16 So. 3d 875, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8542, 2009 WL 1766711 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

16 So. 3d 875 (Kuiken v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Jackson v. State
2 So. 3d 1036 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Rodriguez v. State
982 So. 2d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Bloodsaw v. State
949 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)