Kuiken v. State
16 So. 3d 875, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8542, 2009 WL 1766711
This text of 16 So. 3d 875 (Kuiken v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kuiken v. State, 16 So. 3d 875, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8542, 2009 WL 1766711 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Jackson v. State, 2 So.3d 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Bloodsaw v. State, 949 So.2d 1119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007). Cf. Rodriguez v. State, 982 So.2d 1272 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). See also § 90.404(2)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Jackson v. State
2 So. 3d 1036 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Rodriguez v. State
982 So. 2d 1272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Bloodsaw v. State
949 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 So. 3d 875, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8542, 2009 WL 1766711, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuiken-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.