Kuhleman v. Schuler

Supreme Court of Missouri

Kuhleman v. Schuler

35 Mo. 142

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedMarch 15, 1864

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 35 Mo. 142 (Kuhleman v. Schuler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kuhleman v. Schuler, 35 Mo. 142 (Mo. 1864).

Pincite

Opinion

DhydeN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The lien given by the first section of the Lien Law, specially applicable to St. Louis county, (Sess. Acts of 1857, p. 668,) attaches in favor of a sub-contractor at the time of [146]*146performing the work, or of furnishing the materials, for which such lien is claimed. And the person who is the owner at the time the lien attaches, is the person to whom the notice required by the eighteenth section of the act is to be given. (Schæffer v. Lohman, 34 Mo. 68.)

We find no error in the record. Let .the judgment be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DhydeN, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The lien given by the first section of the Lien Law, specially applicable to St. Louis county, (Sess. Acts of 1857, p. 668,) attaches in favor of a sub-contractor at the time of [146]*146performing the work, or of furnishing the materials, for which such lien is claimed. And the person who is the owner at the time the lien attaches, is the person to whom the notice required by the eighteenth section of the act is to be given. (Schæffer v. Lohman, 34 Mo. 68.)

We find no error in the record. Let .the judgment be affirmed.

The other judges concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Mo. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kuhleman-v-schuler-mo-1864.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack