Kubeck v. Concord Ins. Co.

259 A.2d 473, 107 N.J. Super. 510
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedDecember 8, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 259 A.2d 473 (Kubeck v. Concord Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kubeck v. Concord Ins. Co., 259 A.2d 473, 107 N.J. Super. 510 (N.J. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

107 N.J. Super. 510 (1969)
259 A.2d 473

WILLIAM KUBECK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CONCORD INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT AND FLAHERTY, SHEEDY & RYAN, INC., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY; THOMAS M. FLAHERTY, JOHN J. SHEEDY AND JOHN P. RYAN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND ESTATE OF JOHN C. PERS, ROBERT RADUMSKY, MICHAEL ZVINAKIS, AGNES REA, MICHAEL E. COBB, COUNTY OF HUDSON, AND/OR PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY, PROPER, NECESSARY OR INDISPENSABLE PARTIES TO THIS SUIT-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 24, 1969.
Decided December 8, 1969.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.

Mr. John P. Doran argued the cause for appellant (Mr. James F. McGovern, Jr., attorney).

Mr. Leon Miroff argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Hyman Tobin, on the brief).

Mr. Allan Maitlin argued the cause for respondents (Messrs. Feuerstein, Sach & Maitlin, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

Concord Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court, Chancery Division, adjudicating that its purported cancellation of a liability policy issued to plaintiff was void and unenforceable and further declaring that the policy in question was in full force and effect *511 on February 27, 1967, the date on which plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident.

We have reviewed the voluminous record and conclude that the judgment should be affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the trial judge in his opinion which is reported at 103 N.J. Super. 525.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Insurasource, Inc. v. Phoenix Insurance
912 F. Supp. 2d 433 (S.D. Mississippi, 2012)
Hermann Forwarding v. Pappas Ins.
640 A.2d 1200 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
Rugala v. NJ INS. UNDERWRITING
618 A.2d 352 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Gresham v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co.
590 A.2d 241 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)
Lilly v. Allstate Ins. Co.
527 A.2d 903 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Sheeran v. Sitren
403 A.2d 53 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1979)
Weathers v. Hartford Insurance Group
380 A.2d 724 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
Global American Ins. Managers v. Perera Co.
349 A.2d 108 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Commercial Ins. Co. of Newark v. Apgar
267 A.2d 559 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Campbell v. Ray
259 A.2d 473 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.2d 473, 107 N.J. Super. 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kubeck-v-concord-ins-co-njsuperctappdiv-1969.