Campbell v. Ray
This text of 259 A.2d 473 (Campbell v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
EVALINE B. RAY CAMPBELL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
GLADYS A. RAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF BURT R. RAY, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.
Mr. Murray Greiman argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Lifland and Greiman, attorneys).
Mr. Jesse Moskowitz argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Both parties appeal from portions of the judgment entered in the above cause.
We have considered the entire record and are in substantial accord with the conclusions reached by Judge Matthews as set forth in his opinion reported in 102 N.J. Super. 235 (Ch. 1968).
Affirmed. No costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
259 A.2d 473, 107 N.J. Super. 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/campbell-v-ray-njsuperctappdiv-1969.