Campbell v. Ray
259 A.2d 473, 107 N.J. Super. 509
Opinion
EVALINE B. RAY CAMPBELL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
GLADYS A. RAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF BURT R. RAY, DECEASED, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.
Mr. Murray Greiman argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Lifland and Greiman, attorneys).
Mr. Jesse Moskowitz argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
PER CURIAM.
Both parties appeal from portions of the judgment entered in the above cause.
We have considered the entire record and are in substantial accord with the conclusions reached by Judge Matthews as set forth in his opinion reported in 102 N.J. Super. 235 (Ch. 1968).
Affirmed. No costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Campbell v. Ray, 259 A.2d 473, 107 N.J. Super. 509 (N.J. Ct. App. 1969).
259 A.2d 473 (Campbell v. Ray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ford v. Ford
512 A.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1986)
Estate of Artz v. Artz
487 A.2d 1294 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
In Re Vadlamudi Estate
443 A.2d 1113 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1982)
Howell v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.
327 A.2d 240 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1974)
DeSena v. the Prudential Ins. Co. of America
284 A.2d 363 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1971)
Campbell v. Ray
264 A.2d 441 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1970)
Kubeck v. Concord Ins. Co.
259 A.2d 473 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)