Krystal Alvarez v. Galpin Motors, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided June 13, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-01598·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:22-cv-01598-ODW-MRW Document 59 Filed 06/13/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:424

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 KRYSTAL ALVAREZ. Case № 2:22-cv-01598-ODW (MRWx) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 14 GALPIN MOTORS, INC. et al., JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 15 Defendants. AS MOOT [56] 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Cas@ 2:22-cv-01598-ODW-MRW Document 59 Filed 06/13/22 Page 2of2 Page ID #:425

1 On June 2, 2022, Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC filed a motion 2 || for judgment on the pleadings in this case. (ECF No. 56.) On June 9, 2022, pursuant 3 | to Court Order, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 58.) As the 4|| pending motion for judgment on the pleadings was based on a complaint that is no 5 || longer operative, the motion is DENIED as MOOT. See Ramirez v. Cnty. of San 6 | Bernardino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2015). 10 June 13, 2022 ss 1 wg : Gidllid 3 OTIS D. WRIGHT, II 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Krystal Alvarez v. Galpin Motors, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Krystal Alvarez v. Galpin Motors, Inc. (Krystal Alvarez v. Galpin Motors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sergio Ramirez v. County of San Bernardino
806 F.3d 1002 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)