Krull v. Philadelphia
This text of 114 A.2d 119 (Krull v. Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Krull, Appellant,
v.
Philadelphia.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.
Thomas Raeburn White, with him Warren D. Mulloy, C.L. Cushmore, Jr. and White, Williams & Scott, for appellants.
*2 Harvey Levin, Deputy to the City Solicitor, and Abraham L. Freedman, City Solicitor, for appellees.
Joseph E. Gold, with him Lenard L. Wolffe, Samuel Smith and Gilbert Stein, for appellee.
Harry F. Stambaugh, Special Counsel, with him Herbert B. Cohen, Attorney General, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, May 23, 1955:
The decree of the court below dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed at the appellants' costs on the opinion of President Judge KUN, reported at 2 D. & C. 2d 181, which adequately disposed of the matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 A.2d 119, 382 Pa. 1, 1955 Pa. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krull-v-philadelphia-pa-1955.