Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kronowitz v. Schlansky

Kronowitz v. Schlansky

243 A.D. 729
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 243 A.D. 729 (Kronowitz v. Schlansky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kronowitz v. Schlansky, 243 A.D. 729 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Motion to dispense with printing the testimony on the trial denied. The plaintiffs, appellants, are entitled to relief either by a bill of exceptions or by an abbreviated record. (Capone v. Matteo Realty Corporation, 241 App. Div. 845.) The time to perfect and argue the appeal is extended to the April term. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Tompkins, Davis and Johnston, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Capone v. Matteo Realty Corp.
241 A.D. 845 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronowitz-v-schlansky-nyappdiv-1935.