Kronowitz v. Schlansky
249 A.D. 636, 292 N.Y.S. 182, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5330
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 16, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 249 A.D. 636 (Kronowitz v. Schlansky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Kronowitz v. Schlansky, 249 A.D. 636, 292 N.Y.S. 182, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5330 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
Opinion
In an action for an injunction restraining the defendant from injuring or interfering with the business, property or rights of the plaintiffs, or of their customers, judgment for plaintiffs, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Manhattan Steam Bakery, Inc. v. Schindler
250 A.D. 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 636, 292 N.Y.S. 182, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronowitz-v-schlansky-nyappdiv-1936.