Kronenberger v. Husky

Appellate Court of Illinois

Kronenberger v. Husky

235 N.E.2d 157, 93 Ill. App. 2d 76, 1968 Ill. App. LEXIS 973

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 9, 1968

DocketGen. No. 66-2

StatusPublished

This text of 235 N.E.2d 157 (Kronenberger v. Husky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kronenberger v. Husky, 235 N.E.2d 157, 93 Ill. App. 2d 76, 1968 Ill. App. LEXIS 973 (Ill. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

GOLDENHERSH, J.

This cause was remanded to this court following reversal of the judgment previously entered.¹ The facts and issues are stated in our prior opinion ² and are not here repeated.

The only contentions not considered in our prior opinion are that defendant’s instruction 15 did not follow the IPI form, was confusing, prejudicial to plaintiff, unduly accentuated the application of the statutes to riders of bicycles and would create the impression that the sections quoted therein were applicable only to bicycle riders.

Upon consideration of this instruction in the context of all of the instructions given, we are of the opinion that the jury could not have been misled, nor the plaintiff prejudiced thereby. The judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Clair County is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

EBERSPACHER and MORAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GOLDENHERSH, J.

This cause was remanded to this court following reversal of the judgment previously entered.¹ The facts and issues are stated in our prior opinion ² and are not here repeated.

The only contentions not considered in our prior opinion are that defendant’s instruction 15 did not follow the IPI form, was confusing, prejudicial to plaintiff, unduly accentuated the application of the statutes to riders of bicycles and would create the impression that the sections quoted therein were applicable only to bicycle riders.

Upon consideration of this instruction in the context of all of the instructions given, we are of the opinion that the jury could not have been misled, nor the plaintiff prejudiced thereby. The judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Clair County is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

EBERSPACHER and MORAN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 N.E.2d 157, 93 Ill. App. 2d 76, 1968 Ill. App. LEXIS 973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kronenberger-v-husky-illappct-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack