Kris Petroleum, Ltd., a Corporation, and Kris Petroleum, Inc., a Corporation v. Wesley Stoddard, Little Valley Oil Co., a Corporation, and Ted Erdmann

221 F.2d 801, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 27, 1955
Docket14535
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 221 F.2d 801 (Kris Petroleum, Ltd., a Corporation, and Kris Petroleum, Inc., a Corporation v. Wesley Stoddard, Little Valley Oil Co., a Corporation, and Ted Erdmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kris Petroleum, Ltd., a Corporation, and Kris Petroleum, Inc., a Corporation v. Wesley Stoddard, Little Valley Oil Co., a Corporation, and Ted Erdmann, 221 F.2d 801, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3576 (9th Cir. 1955).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The above entitled suit was brought in a Washington State court by appellees Stoddard and Little Valley Oil Company against appellants to foreclose labor and material liens upon real property of the latter. The case .was subsequently removed to the court below on diversity grounds. Thereafter appellee Erdmann, claiming a labor lien allegedly on the same property, moved for leave to intex’-vene. The court, over,objection of appellants, entered an order permitting the intervention and the filing of a complaint. Appellants then moved for the dismissal of the; complaint in intervention, and their motion was denied. Appellants thereupon gave notice of appeal from the order granting intervention.

Appellee Erdmann has moved for a dismissal of the appeal on the ground that the order permitting his intervention is not appealable.

The motion to dismiss must be granted. The order permitting intervention was not a final order. It was purely interlocutory, and is not among those interlocutory orders which are made ap-pealable by statute. Perhaps it was erroneous, but obviously the order may be reviewed and the error corrected in this court only upon appeal from the final judgment in the foreclosure proceedings.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alsea Valley Alliance v. Department of Commerce
358 F.3d 1181 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
Whitefish Credit Union Ass'n v. Glacier Wilderness Ranch, Inc.
791 P.2d 1363 (Montana Supreme Court, 1990)
Mayflower Development Corp. v. Town of Dennis
418 N.E.2d 349 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1981)
Van Hoomissen v. Xerox Corp.
497 F.2d 180 (Ninth Circuit, 1974)
Town of Coventry v. Hickory Ridge Campground, Inc.
306 A.2d 824 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
221 F.2d 801, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 3576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kris-petroleum-ltd-a-corporation-and-kris-petroleum-inc-a-ca9-1955.