Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.

Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.

118 N.Y.S. 1119
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 12, 1909·Published

Opinion

PER CTJRIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide tbe event, for the error in striking ont tbe evidence respecting tbe promise of the foreman, and tbat with such evidence in the case there was a question for the jury, within the authority of Rice v. Eureka Paper Co., 174 N. Y. 385, 66 N. E. 979, 62 L. R. A. 611, 95 Am. St. Rep. 585.

BURR and RICH, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co., 118 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

118 N.Y.S. 1119 (Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice v. . Eureka Paper Co.
66 N.E. 979 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)