Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.

Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.

118 N.Y.S. 1119
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 12, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 118 N.Y.S. 1119 (Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co., 118 N.Y.S. 1119 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

PER CTJRIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide tbe event, for the error in striking ont tbe evidence respecting tbe promise of the foreman, and tbat with such evidence in the case there was a question for the jury, within the authority of Rice v. Eureka Paper Co., 174 N. Y. 385, 66 N. E. 979, 62 L. R. A. 611, 95 Am. St. Rep. 585.

BURR and RICH, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rice v. . Eureka Paper Co.
66 N.E. 979 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 N.Y.S. 1119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kreusch-v-werther-rausch-co-nyappdiv-1909.