Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.

Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.

134 A.D. 936
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, for the error in striking out the evidence respecting the promise of the foreman, and that with such evidence in the case there was a question for the jury within the authority of Rice v. Eureka Paper Co. (174 N. Y. 385). Jenks, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred; Burr and Rich, JJ,, dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co., 134 A.D. 936 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

134 A.D. 936 (Kreusch v. Werther & Rausch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rice v. . Eureka Paper Co.
66 N.E. 979 (New York Court of Appeals, 1903)