Krell v. Kappenman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Krell v. Kappenman

297 N.W.2d 807, 1980 S.D. LEXIS 437

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 5, 1980

DocketNo. 12974

StatusPublished

This text of 297 N.W.2d 807 (Krell v. Kappenman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Krell v. Kappenman, 297 N.W.2d 807, 1980 S.D. LEXIS 437 (S.D. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs initiated this action in small claims court. Defendants transferred the action to circuit court for trial by jury. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiffs appeal. We dismiss the appeal. SDCL 15-39-23; Hauswirth v. Hartigan, 296 N.W.2d 535 (S.D.1980); and Magnum Construction v. Sioux Falls Nautilus, 296 N.W.2d 536 (S.D.1980).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs initiated this action in small claims court. Defendants transferred the action to circuit court for trial by jury. At the close of plaintiffs’ case, the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. Plaintiffs appeal. We dismiss the appeal. SDCL 15-39-23; Hauswirth v. Hartigan, 296 N.W.2d 535 (S.D.1980); and Magnum Construction v. Sioux Falls Nautilus, 296 N.W.2d 536 (S.D.1980).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 N.W.2d 807, 1980 S.D. LEXIS 437, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krell-v-kappenman-sd-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack