Hauswirth v. Hartigan
This text of 296 N.W.2d 535 (Hauswirth v. Hartigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an attempted appeal from a judgment entered in a breach of contract action initiated by appellee in small claims court for failure of appellant to pay him $800 as promised for substantially completing the painting, staining and varnishing of a house. Appellant removed the action to circuit court for jury trial pursuant to SDCL 15-39-17.
Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court must appear plainly and affirmatively from the record presented, and absent such a showing, this Court is required to determine its jurisdiction to consider the merits of the appeal. Estate of Putnam, 254 N.W.2d 460 (S.D.1977). Under SDCL 15-39-23, this Court is without jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a trial by jury pursuant to transfer of a small claims action to circuit court. * Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 N.W.2d 535, 1980 S.D. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hauswirth-v-hartigan-sd-1980.