Kreizer v. Kitaoka

72 N.Y.S. 1114
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided May 15, 1901·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from must be affirmed. The record shows willful contempt for the court's mandate. The defendant disposed of his property contrary to the injunction contained in the order for his examination, thereby causing plaintiff’s damage in at least the sum of $250. The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs. Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kreizer v. Kitaoka, 72 N.Y.S. 1114 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

72 N.Y.S. 1114 (Kreizer v. Kitaoka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.