Kreizer v. Kitaoka

City of New York Municipal Court

Kreizer v. Kitaoka

35 Misc. 842

DecidedMay 15, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 35 Misc. 842 (Kreizer v. Kitaoka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kreizer v. Kitaoka, 35 Misc. 842 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from must he affirmed. The record shows willful contempt for the court’s mandate. The defendant disposed of his property contrary to the injunction contained in the order for his examination, thereby causing plaintiff’s damage in, at least, the sum of $250.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Delehanty and Schuchman, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The order appealed from must he affirmed. The record shows willful contempt for the court’s mandate. The defendant disposed of his property contrary to the injunction contained in the order for his examination, thereby causing plaintiff’s damage in, at least, the sum of $250.

The order appealed from is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Fitzsimons, Ch. J., Delehanty and Schuchman, JJ.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Misc. 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kreizer-v-kitaoka-nynyccityct-1901.