Kratzer Const. v. Hardy Const.
Opinion
06/12/2024
Case Number: DA 24-0320
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
DA 24-0320
BUCK KRATZER, d/b/a KRATZER CONSTRUCTION,
Plaintiff and Appellees, ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT v.
HARDY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.,
Defendant and Appellant.
This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT Jesse Dwaine Roybal, whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this June 12, 2024.
r--6--6f Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Bryce Anthony Burke, Brandon James Tyler Hoskins, Alex W. Hamman, Jesse Dwaine Roybal
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kratzer Const. v. Hardy Const. (Kratzer Const. v. Hardy Const.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.