Krasnov v. United States
This text of 355 U.S. 5 (Krasnov v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
KRASNOV ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.
Supreme Court of United States.
C. Brewster Rhoads for appellants in No. 238.
Robert L. Wright and Milton M. Gottesman for appellants in No. 254.
Joseph F. Padlon for appellant in No. 255.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Daniel M. Friedman and Joseph F. Tubridy for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITTAKER are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
NOTES
[*] Together with No. 254, Comfy Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States, and No. 255, Oppenheimer v. United States, also on appeals from the same court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
355 U.S. 5, 2 L. Ed. 2d 21, 78 S. Ct. 34, 115 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 70, 1957 U.S. LEXIS 1684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/krasnov-v-united-states-scotus-1957.